|
New Islington Millennium Community, Manchester
Method(s) Used
Name of person who posted the project:Karin Gavelin (Involve)
Location of project:United Kingdom
Date when the project started:2002
Date when the project ended/project ongoing:
Background to project:In 2002 the Ancoats area of East Manchester was identified as the site for the third Millennium Community. The English Partnerships and Communities and Local Government (CLG) Millennium Communities programme was designed to create seven exemplar sustainable communities across the UK, with good transport links, shops and community facilities as a priority. The programme ethos is to provide a “good range of high quality and innovative homes to facilitate an environmentally friendly lifestyle” .The £250 million New Islington Millennium Community development comprises a 12.5-hectare site, which includes the former Cardroom Estate. The estate was notorious for high crime levels and social deprivation, and at the time the site was identified for development only half of the 204 homes were occupied. The Millennium Communities involvement with this part of Manchester came alongside an injection of £125 million funding from the Government in 2003 to regenerate large areas of the North of England, as well as a drive by the New East Manchester agency to double the population from 30,000 to 60,000 within 10 years. As the New Islington project is ongoing, it is estimated that the development will be completely finished around 2012, this case study examines the process up to the time of writing and looks at any initial outcomes. Purpose of project:The vision for the New Islington development was originally stated as the reinvention of “the previously neglected and rundown estate with cutting-edge architecture, new waterways and new housing.” This was to include up to 1,734 new homes including affordable housing, commercial space for new shops, pubs, restaurants, cafes, bars and a number of facilities, including a new canal and water park, a primary school and a state-of-the-art primary health clinic.Beyond the physical rebuild of the locality, there was also a desire by all involved to rejuvenate the social aspects of life in East Manchester and improve the cohesion of the community. Urban Splash, the property firm chosen as lead developer for the New Islington development, recognised that early and consistent public involvement would be vital to the project’s success. Project activities:The key elements running through the whole engagement process are the early involvement of residents, the accepted validity of their input, the ease of entry to engagement, the innovative use of techniques e.g. competitions, websites etc, and the consistency of engagement where by both developers and architects engaged with local residents.Some of the main points in the public engagement process for this project so far are outlined below:
Project results:So far the New Islington development is proceeding according to plan. Residents moved in early 2006 to some of the twenty three first houses on the site. Existing residents are guaranteed a house in their old neighbourhood and can stay where they are until their new house is ready if they so wish.The reported feeling on New Islington from outside of East Manchester so far appears to be broadly positive . This includes support for the innovative architecture and the environmental and social credentials of the development. There has been some criticism for a shortcoming of social housing and concerns that an emphasis on security may lessen the community spirit that the developers are so keen to preserve. However, generally feedback is that the project is on track to deliver. Longer-term outcomes remain to be seen. The feedback from existing residents is clear the development is a constructive process but that it will not necessarily solve all of the existing problems in the area. However, those that are staying tend to like the design of their new houses and feel at home there, which is considered to be because they had a large input into choosing the architects and developing the plans. "They listened. They really listened to what we wanted. And we just liked them as people." Cardroom resident, April 2007 Contact details:
|
Recommended Case Studies
|