Skip navigation

Planning Portal Forum, in association with Communities and Local Government

Method(s) Used


Name of person who posted the project:

Kerry Ryan


Location of project:

United Kingdom


Date when the project started:

2007


Date when the project ended/project ongoing:

2007


Background to project:

The Planning Portal is the UK government�s online planning and regulation resource. Oversight is provided by Communities and Local Government.

Purpose of project:

The Planning Portal recently developed a specific product (the 1APP, National Standard Planning Application Form) and invited local planning authorities (LPAs) to take part in a consultation about its implementation.
The forum was set up to feed into the consultation about IAPP. Its specific objectives were to:
  • Identify and share best practice solutions for e-planning in local authorities;
  • Inform Planning Portal product development and service improvement;
  • Support and encourage take-up of LPA e-planning services;
  • Allow LPAs to follow up courses and events with peers and Planning Portal representatives

Project activities:

Online deliberative forum.
The forum was established for a core stakeholder base � the 410 local planning authorities in England and Wales. Those wishing to read or contribute to the forum required a gov.uk email address to register.
The forum was pre-moderated by Planning Portal staff. Representatives from the consultation team logged-in to promote deliberation and respond to queries.
A number of discrete themes were opened up for discussion and feedback. Some were broad; others more detailed:
  • National Register Feasibility study;
  • Take-up;
  • LPA forum events 2007;
  • Storing PDFs in Idox document management systems;
  • IAPP, The National Standard Planning Application Form;
  • Adobe measurement tool;
  • Open Suggestions.

Project results:

Strengths
  • The online consultation had a clarity of purpose and a defined user base;
  • The forum provided a dedicated �safe space� to discuss policy in open, transparent terms;
  • Moderators were responsive to user input;
  • Background information was made available in a resources section;
  • The rate of registrations was high;
  • The rate of posts retained a consistency.
    Potential for improvement
  • The participation rate was low when compared to stated user interest;
  • The community had limited time to coalesce and build momentum;
  • The forum used a pre-moderation strategy, which slowed the dialogue amongst a known stakeholder group;
  • The exercise would have benefited from involvement of policy leads who had the knowledge to be able to respond on specifics about policy (in support of moderators);
  • A greater range of means by which users could respond to consultation would have accommodated different levels of expertise and tastes.

Contact details:

www.planningportalforum.net

Source:Digital Dialogues Second Phase report - Hansard Society/Ministry of Justice 2007
eDemocracy Programme,
Hansard Society,
40-43 Chancery Lane
London WC2A 1JA
e - edemocracy@hansard.lse.ac.uk
t - 020 7438 1222

Recommended Case Studies
Act on it (Forum Theatre)
GM Nation
Taking it on (Online Consultation)
The Walsall Participatory Appraisal Network
Udecide Newcastle
Your Health Your Care Your Say